When light passes through a prism the
amount of deviation depends on the refractive index, and since the refractive index is
different for different wavelengths the deviation differs for different colours of light.
If
a beam of white light is shone on a prism as shown in Figure 1 the refracted beam is
separated into a spectrum (for the present we will restrict ourselves to a consideration of the
visible spectrum).
This spreading of the beam is called dispersion and can be shown
to depend both on the refracting angle of the prism and on the refractive index of the material
of which it is made.
If nR and nB are the refractive indices for red and
blue light at the extreme ends of the visible spectrum, then the deviations for red and blue
light are:
dR = (nR - 1)A and dB = (nB - 1)A
respectively.
Therefore for a prism of small angle the angular dispersion (φ) is given by the formula:
nC | nD | nF | |
Crown glass | 1.5150 | 1.5175 | 1.5233 |
Flint glass | 1.6434 | 1.6550 | 1.6648 |
A useful property to consider when calculating the dispersion is the dispersive power of a material. This depends only on the type of material of which a prism or lens is made and not on its shape. Dispersive power is defined as:
Although the dispersion of white light is useful when we want to look at the
spectrum of the light it is a real problem in optical instruments such as telescopes. The
lenses in these instruments disperse different colours by different amounts and so bring the
different colours to different foci. The images formed are coloured and blurred. It is therefore
necessary to deviate the light without dispersing it, and prisms and lenses that do this are
called achromatic (Greek, 'without colour').
(a) The achromatic prism
Such a
prism is a compound prism made of two prisms of materials with different refractive indices,
say n and n'.
The dispersion for prism 1 will be: dR - dB =
(nB - nR)A
and that for prism 2: d'R -
d'B = (n'B - n'R)A'.
The dispersion of lenses can be a serious problem in large astronomical instruments - for example, the difference in focal length for red and blue light for a telescope with a mean focal length of around 15 m can be as much as 45 cm. (An exaggerated version of the defect is shown in Figure 3). Such a difference is obviously quite unacceptable when a clearly focused image is required.
In addition to chromatic
aberration described above, lenses suffer from several other defects.
(a) Spherical
aberration
This is a result of the inner and outer portions of a lens having different focal
lengths, that of the outside being shorter than that of the centre.
One way of reducing this
is to make the deviation at the two surfaces as nearly equal as possible. Spherical aberration
is therefore particularly marked when using a piano-convex lens with parallel light hitting the
plane face.
Spherical aberration is also reduced by decreasing the aperture of a lens and
by increasing its focal length.
(b) Coma
This defect produces a comet-like tail
added to all images. It results from off-axis objects coupled with the different magnifications
of different zones of the lens.
The rays from the vertical plane intersect in a horizontal
line while those from a horizontal plane intersect in a vertical line.
(c)
Astigmatism
If the object point lies off the axis of the lens then the rays from the
horizontal and vertical planes come to a focus at different distances from the
lens.
(d) Distortion
The magnification of the lens varies from its centre to its edge
and so the magnification of the image will vary as well. This gives rise to
distortion.